[ Milos Stojanovic @ 14.11.2006. 12:08 ] @
Nešto mi nije jasno, probao sam da čitam RFC al ne vredi.

Zanima me Route Damping, onako kako je definisan u BGPu. Konkretno, šta znači vrednost Half_Life, da li

a) Penalty tokom vremena opada linearno, tj. Half_Life je jednak vremenu za koje se jedan kvant penalty-ja smanji za pola
ili
b) Penalty opada exponencijalni, tj. Half_Life je jednak vremenu za koje se pola ukupnog do sada akumuliranog penalty-ja smanji za pola (pod pretpostavkom da ne dolaze novi Penalty-ji)
[ markom @ 14.11.2006. 12:34 ] @
Probaj da pročitaš ovo:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/pro...9186a00800ca763.html#wp1002395

Kad si to savladao, onda baci pogled na:

ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-378.txt

Marko.
[ Milos Stojanovic @ 14.11.2006. 23:33 ] @
ok, tnx, pogledah, a u međuvremenu sam pronašao i primer koji lepo oslikava

Citat:
For example, a route with a penalty of 3000 will take the half-life time of 15 minutes to cut the penalty in half and reach the reuse penalty of 1500, at which point the route will be advertised again. Similarly, a route with a penalty of 6000 will take 15 minutes to cut the penalty in half and reach a penalty of 3000. It will then an additional 15 minutes to cut the penalty in half again and reach the reuse penalty of 1500. The total decay time from 6000 to 1500 (i.e., reuse) with a half-life time of 15 will be 30 minutes


Dakle opadanje jeste linearno, ali nije uvek iste brzine ;)