[ Sopocanac @ 26.05.2007. 19:14 ] @
Ajde da izmerimo koji provajder je najbolji za gaming (tj koji provajder ima najbolji ping) . Kao referentni server cemo koristiti glavni DNS ptt-a sa IP adresom 212.62.32.1

Znaci otvorite command prompt u Windowsu i kucate ping 212.62.32.1 -n 10

Takodje prilikom postavljanja rezultata obavezno navedite i LOKACIJU/GRAD odakle ste i koji paket koristite, jer po mom misljenju kvalitet usluge se razlikuje i od grada do grada i od toga koji paket imate. Uglavnom da proverimo sve :)

[ Sopocanac @ 26.05.2007. 19:19 ] @
Evo mog rezultata:

Lokacija: Kraljevo
Paket: 256kbit
Prosecan ping: 51ms

Ping statistics for 212.62.32.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 51ms
[ night-shift @ 26.05.2007. 20:24 ] @
Zašto baš PTT-ov??

Ali ajde evo rezultata na 768 kbps, provajder Telekom:

Code:
Ping statistics for 212.62.32.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 17ms
[ djricky @ 26.05.2007. 21:30 ] @
i nije ti neki test (a i pises sa sbb kablovskog)

sta cu ja sto nemam peering sa ptt-om, pa mi paketi putuju preko madjarske?
i koji je to gaming server na ptt-u?

zatim, sta ce korisnici kojima je po defaultu port u interleaved stanju, pa im je ping skoro 3x veci?



[Ovu poruku je menjao djricky dana 28.05.2007. u 00:49 GMT+1]
[ Slobodan Milivojevic @ 27.05.2007. 02:34 ] @
Ako hoces dobar ping, uzmi dobar cable, ili dobar wireless... Od ADSL-a nema mnogo vajde sto se toga tice.
[ djricky @ 27.05.2007. 11:46 ] @
ne mora da znaci, evo pinga do mog gateway-a

>ping 85.222.161.17
This is hrPING v2.26 by cFos Software GmbH -- http://www.cfos.de

Pinging 85.222.161.17
with 64 bytes data (92 bytes IP):

Reply from 85.222.161.17: seq=0000 time=11.715ms TTL=254 ID=270f
Reply from 85.222.161.17: seq=0001 time=10.746ms TTL=254 ID=2734
Reply from 85.222.161.17: seq=0002 time=11.302ms TTL=254 ID=274d
Reply from 85.222.161.17: seq=0003 time=10.903ms TTL=254 ID=276c

Statistics for 85.222.161.17:
Packets: sent=4, rcvd=4, error=0, lost=0 (0% loss) in 1.518955 sec
RTTs of replies in ms: min/avg/max: 10.746 / 11.166 / 11.715
[ Slobodan Milivojevic @ 27.05.2007. 21:12 ] @
pa ovo je jedan od boljih ADSL-ova kod tebe ricky.

Evo malo kako je kod mene:

Telekom ADSL u Pirotu:
Code:
root@gateway:~# ping 77.46.248.1
PING 77.46.248.1 (77.46.248.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=21.5 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=19.5 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=21.6 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=23.7 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=19.8 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=22.0 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=22.1 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=20.2 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=22.5 ms
64 bytes from 77.46.248.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=18.6 ms

--- 77.46.248.1 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 9998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 18.620/21.293/23.743/1.472 ms


ExeNet wireless u Nisu:
Code:
root@gateway:~# ping 212.62.62.3
PING 212.62.62.3 (212.62.62.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.86 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.27 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.37 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.14 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=82.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.76 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2.37 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.11 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.19 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=9.21 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.97 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=3.12 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=2.45 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=2.31 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=2.50 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=33.5 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=2.17 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=2.37 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=2.38 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=2.17 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=2.01 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=2.12 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=2.19 ms
64 bytes from 212.62.62.3: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=2.08 ms

--- 212.62.62.3 ping statistics ---
24 packets transmitted, 24 received, 0% packet loss, time 23123ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.975/7.408/82.075/16.798 ms


Ovo sto malo skoci ping je zbog protoka na linku, nije bio bas skroz cist link.
[ miki86 @ 27.05.2007. 23:19 ] @
Lokacija: Pirot
Paket: 256kbit
Provajder: BeocityNet
[ djricky @ 27.05.2007. 23:51 ] @
Citat:
Slobodan Milivojevic: pa ovo je jedan od boljih ADSL-ova kod tebe ricky.


verat 512k, ali je Fast port, i duzina parice je cca 150 metara
[ GFC @ 28.05.2007. 12:11 ] @
Citat:
djricky: verat 512k, ali je Fast port, i duzina parice je cca 150 metara


Citat:
djricky: 
zatim, sta ce korisnici kojima je po defaultu port u interleaved stanju, pa im je ping skoro 3x veci?
[Ovu poruku je menjao djricky dana 28.05.2007. u 00:49 GMT+1]


Nije mi jasna jedna stvar ovde:

Da li ja, kao običan korisnik, mogu da učinim nešto da izbegnem taj "interleaving" mod? Ti kažeš da imaš Fast port, pa me zanima kako si uspeo to sebi da omogućiš?

Da li postoji neka procedura da se to ostvari? Pretpostavljam da treba nešto da se "čačne" u centrali na portu, samo me interesuje kome da se obratim da me "prebace" na Fast port ukoliko je to uopšte moguće?

ADSL koristim samo za online igranje, pa mi je ping presudan.

Hvala unapred na odgovoru.
[ djricky @ 28.05.2007. 23:06 ] @
ping zavisi dosta i od brzine na portu, kao i od udaljenosti centrale od TKC-a itd...
za port, pitas provajdera, ako zele mogu da ti izadju u susret tako sto ce zvati telekom i traziti izmenu mada mozda dobijes i ono sto nisi trazio :)

What is "Interleaved Mode?"
DMT ADSL (one of the two principal forms of ADSL, the other being CAP) can commonly be configured to operate in two different modes:

Interleaved Mode
Data is spread out during ADSL transmission. This improves the ability to correct errors due to noise pulses, and can thus make the connection more reliable. However, interleaving increases latency (delay). The amount of interleaving determines the amount of spread and hence the amount of latency. Interleaved Mode is required with G.lite (because more adverse line conditions are expected).
Fast (or FastPath) Mode
Lower latency than Interleaved Mode, but more vulnerable to errors due to noise pulses.

If your "ping" time to the closest/first node (often called a "gateway") is less than 30 ms, your DMT ADSL is probably configured for Fast Mode. Otherwise, unless the physical distance to that closest/first node is unusually far, your DMT ADSL is probably configured for Interleaved Mode. (See "How to find out what's slowing you down")

For most uses the difference in latency is usually not significant, and the increase in reliability can be useful or even vital. However, the difference in latency can be important for fans of real-time gaming over the Internet. If you fall into that category; are on DMT and aren't on G.lite; aren't unusually far from the closest node; and experience latency to the closest node of more than about 30 ms, you may be able to persuade your provider to switch you from Interleaved Mode to Fast Mode if such a switch is possible. (It may not be.)

http://cable-dsl.home.att.net/#Interleaved
http://www.kitz.co.uk/adsl/interleaving.htm

[ GFC @ 29.05.2007. 14:02 ] @
Hvala.
[ supaplex007 @ 18.01.2008. 11:44 ] @
Hvala