[ 4n0n @ 03.12.2010. 21:51 ] @
Da, dobro ste procitali! Vijest je s kojim danom zakasnjenja... http://www.siemens.com/press/e...e/2010/industry/i201011037.htm Kao sto kazu iz catiacommunity-a: Who could win and keep the big accounts? Hundreds of millions of dollars/euros are at stake, not just from the big OEM itself but from the pull-through of their extensive supply chain companies. Ne treba ni napominjati da je: Today Siemens is one of the leading suppliers of PLM software with 6.7 million licenses and 69.500 customers around the world. The market for PLM software is exhibiting stronger growth than any other business software market. In 2009 the market had a volume of € 23 billion with a growth rate of 8% p.a. by 2014. Sluzbeno priopcenje iz Dassaulta: “Uns wurde von Daimler mitgeteilt, dass ihre Entscheidung auf ihrem selbst entwickelten PDM System ‘Smaragd’ und dessen CAD-Integration basiere und dass das CAD-Anwendungsportfolio nicht maßgeblich für ihre Entscheidung gewesen sei.” Hladan tus je upravo radi toga sto je: Am 20. September 2010 erneuerte die Daimler AG ihren Catia Vertrag mit Dassault Systèmes für fünf weitere Jahre. Znaci tocno malo vise od mjesec dana nakon sto su potpisali ugovor o suradnji na sljedecih 5 godina i onda bum! Jedno od logicnih objasnjenja je i od Oleg-a Shilovitskog sa beyondplm.com: The cost of change is continuing to impact all software decisions. for 2000s CAD change was more costly compared to PDM change. Large companies like Daimler finally discovered – data backbone upgrade will be more expensive. Zakljucak: jos jedna u nizu izgubljenih musterija Dassaulta, hoce li ovo biti preveliki udarac za CATIA-u (u sto sumnjam) - vrijeme ce pokazati. |