[ markom @ 20.12.2004. 16:00 ] @
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/18/spam.lawsuit.ap/index.html
[ Ivan Dimkovic @ 20.12.2004. 16:03 ] @
Ovo je pobeda za normalni svet... way to go!

Jos nekoliko ovakvih presuda i spam ce biti vrlo mali problem :)
[ Gojko Vujovic @ 20.12.2004. 22:56 ] @
Mnogo velika cifra, da nisu pogrešili za par nula? ;)

Neverovatno je kolike su tu pare u igri bile u stvari... zamislite tek zarade spamera. Pa jasno je što je 70% mailova u mom inboxu spam.
[ boccio @ 21.12.2004. 01:12 ] @
Nisu tu u pitanju zarade spamera, one su daleko manje. Ovo je lepa drakonska kazna, jasno je svima zbog cega...
Citat:

Kramer's attorney, Kelly Wallace, said he is unlikely to ever collect the judgment, which was made possible by an Iowa law that allows plaintiffs to claim damages of $10 per spam message. The judgments were then tripled under RICO.

$10 po poruci...ubistveno :)